CO129-267 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [4-6] — Page 251

entatain this memorial and

M. Sangster should be informed accordingly. The Frchange confonsation

allowance was non intended

А

to be alternative to and t

the

fainlage of family remittance

fffficers who

in the case

enjoy

the latter privilege; and in Ceylon it has been notified that

the election between the two

alternatives must be final

And that

the compensatio

remittance, it is no

allowance is

accepted

in lieu

I family l'anger

there is no

longer any

hereafter the

option left of reverting t

remittance Privilege.

The same

family in the eventing #t Wule should be followed in

Hong Kong

3. I see no

sufficient

Zeasm

for accepting the suggestion

with regard

to this case

C

248

which is contained in the

last paragraph of the acting Preasurer's memorandum,